Subscribe to our newsletter
Stay in the loop with TWS and The Weird Show Gallery.
Subscribe to receive updates on upcoming exhibitions, new drops, exclusive previews, and special offers.
Madrid, Spain
Bio
Statement
The artist's process
Understanding the method behind the work is fundamental in grasping the significance of the latter. The work method was founded on a succession of ordered steps that followed an unforeseeable course.
During the first stage, the artist took two small collages as a model (21 × 14 cm) and made a painting of each of them. He then recorded them photographically. The resulting enlarged developed prints and the archive images used for the two initial small collages served as material to make the first two collages in this series. When these collages were finished, the two previous paintings were destroyed with a chemical solvent and the damaged outcomes were photographically recorded.
During the second stage, a third collage was made using the large photographic prints of the initial two collages and the photographs of the solvent-damaged paintings. A photograph was taken of this third collage, and the print of it and leftover printed material from the previous collages served to make the next work in the series. The photograph of the latter was used with any leftovers from previous works to make the next one, and so on, in a process whose end is only dependent on the total disappearance of all the leftovers used as raw materials for each new collage.
Piece of Trash is a eulogy to leftovers and to the equivocal as opposed to the unequivocal.
"Every work of art has a context that generated it, a context that isn't always visible. In this case, accessing the entire series reveals key aspects of the process and allows for a direct visual and artistic association with the series' concept. However, in Piece of Trash, each work carries its own layers of information, in addition to the layers of information from the collages that preceded it. These individual pieces raise reflections on the construction and deconstruction of historical narratives through the fragmentation and subsequent reconstruction of images. "
Nacho Martín Silva
Nº1
Collage.
200 x 150 cm.
2016
Nº2
Collage.
200 x 150 cm.
2016
This series doesn’t treat collage as the sketch or study for a painting, which becomes the “real” artwork. He flips this idea making the painting just a part of the process, but not the final thing.The paintings are made specifically to be photographed and then destroyed. What's left is a photographic record of them dissolving, recycled into the next collage in the chain. Painting stops being the destination and becomes raw material, closer to a plank of wood than a finished picture.
That process puts the series in curious company at that particular foundation. Miró spent the years after 1927 pursuing something somehow similar. He called it wanting to assassinate painting, and answered the impulse by gluing sandpaper, tar paper, and wire onto canvas, then cutting jagged holes straight through his own collages. Martín Silva's chain of destroyed paintings and cannibalized collages sits in that lineage: a documented killing of one medium to feed the other.
-
Nº3
Collage.
200 x 150 cm.
2016
Nº4
Collage.
200 x 150 cm.
2016
Nº5
Collage.
200 x 150 cm.
2016
Nº6
Collage.
200 x 150 cm.
2016
"Starting with photographic documentation of the result of a physical action like painting allows me to explore the idea of trompe l'oeil, referring more to the process itself than to the space. It raises a reflection on the idea of fiction and alters the hierarchies of representation. "
Nacho Martín Silva
Nº7
Collage.
200 x 150 cm.
2016
Nº8
Collage.
200 x 150 cm.
2016
Nº9
Collage.
200 x 150 cm.
2016
Nº10
Collage.
200 x 150 cm.
2016
Stay in the loop with TWS and The Weird Show Gallery.
Subscribe to receive updates on upcoming exhibitions, new drops, exclusive previews, and special offers.
We know you can’t buy every artwork in the exhibition — but actually, you can: get the catalog and take them all home.
"I like to suspend that moment of legibility in an image. Because that’s the moment when the image is just an image and no longer a transparent conduit to something else."
John Stezaker
In conversation with
Immi at Knotnorious
2016